Your migration is complete. Your trust is now continuously sustained. This phase does not end — it is the environment you now live in.
Can I still trust my environment today?
YES
Continuously monitored by HATS — right now, not just at migration.
Nothing requires your attention.
Your environment — answered right now
Is my architecture still valid?
✓ Valid
Is governance still intact?
✓ Intact
Is privacy still intact?
✓ Intact
Has anything drifted?
✓ No drift
Do I need to do anything?
✓ Nothing
Continuous status — HATS is monitoring the approved architecture; APQC holds the baseline
Architecture
✓ Matches APQC-2026-001
Governance
✓ No drift
Privacy
✓ TFHE · CKKS · H33-Key intact
Credentials
✓ AWS ACM lease — healthy
Recommended: Review
Continuous monitoring by HATS — surfaced only when something changes
HATS · Continuous Monitoring
Nothing requires your attention. HATS is monitoring the approved architecture continuously and surfaces a recommendation only when something changes.
Recommendations — not alerts
No recommendations right now. Your environment matches the commissioned architecture.
Recommendation
Review the AWS ACM lease policy change
The lease policy on AWS ACM Production changed and no longer matches the commissioned baseline. Your environment is still trusted — this is advisory. I recommend reviewing the change and re-confirming the credential lease.
Artifact — Trusted Operating Baseline
Artifact
Trusted Operating Baseline
ID
APQC-2026-001-B
Architecture FP
computing…
Current FP
computing…
Drift Summary
No drift · current matches baseline
Governance
Intact ✓
Credentials
Healthy
Privacy
Intact ✓
Verification
APQC-2026-001-F verified
JSON · Trusted Operating Baseline APQC-2026-001-B · every future comparison derives from this artifact.
Your environment is now operating under continuously verifiable trust.
You didn't just complete a migration. You transitioned into an environment where trust is continually sustained — not periodically re-established.
Every phase removed one more assumption you had to make.
Trust the agent → the assessment → the architect → the proof → the commissioning → the supervision → the evidence →
finally, trust continuously — because the system keeps proving itself.
✓ Your environment is now protected
You didn't finish a migration — you now live in a continuously protected environment. Capabilities turn on here as you need them; nothing ever starts over.
Status✓ Protected
EnvironmentAPQC-2026-001
Today’s recommendationNothing requires your attention
APQC is the coordinator of governed cryptographic-estate transformation. It exists because crypto migration is a lifecycle that must be orchestrated across many components without losing governance. Sustain is the phase that never ends: the conversion completes, but governance does not. Continuous monitoring of the running estate is done by HATS; APQC holds the trusted operating baseline and, when drift appears, coordinates re-opening the lifecycle under fresh authorized intent. APQC coordinates — it does not do the monitoring.
The APQC invariant. The “YES — can I still trust my environment” answer is a property monitored by HATS against the baseline, not a claim APQC produces on its own. APQC holds the baseline; HATS watches the estate and surfaces a recommendation only when something changes; Verification renders any fresh verdict; Authority Center preserves the governed authority over time. If drift is found, nothing is silently adapted — the lifecycle re-enters Discover under re-authorized intent.
Who owns each adjacent responsibility:HATS monitors and records continuously · Authority Center preserves authority · Verification renders the verdict · H33-74 produces the portable evidence · Agent-008 governs re-authorized action. When to use APQC vs. another capability: use APQC to coordinate the sustain loop and hold the baseline; use HATS directly for continuous control monitoring on its own.
On the status shown: this is a reference engagement — a single environment (APQC-2026-001) replayed to show what continuous, HATS-driven monitoring looks like. It dramatizes presentation, never the facts. The “monitored right now” state describes HATS watching the approved baseline; the specific status is illustrative of that model, not a live claim about your environment.
Common questions
Does APQC do the monitoring?
No — and this is the point of the phase. Continuous monitoring is done by HATS, which watches the running estate against the commissioned baseline and surfaces a recommendation only when something changes. APQC holds the baseline and coordinates the loop; it does not itself watch the estate.
Does APQC render the verdict here?
No. Any fresh verdict is rendered by Verification, independently, from evidence. The Sustain page shows HATS-monitored status against the baseline APQC holds; the trust that status rests on is verified by Verification and preserved by Authority Center, not asserted by APQC.
What happens when HATS detects drift?
The lifecycle re-opens. Nothing is silently adapted: on drift, changed standard, or new intent, APQC coordinates a return to Discover under fresh authorized intent, delta-linked to the prior cycle. There is deliberately no terminal “done” state — the loop is the recovery.
Is “YES, still trusted” a live production result?
No. This walkthrough replays one reference engagement to illustrate continuous governance. The model is real — HATS monitors, APQC holds the baseline, Verification proves, Authority Center preserves — but the specific status shown is illustrative, not a live measurement of your environment.