From Self-Reported Controls to Verifiable System State
Related · tier-1 reading. For the evidence chain that supports the claim, see Claims Evidence.
Continuous attestation for cyber insurance. No plaintext exposure. Underwriting and claims inputs backed by cryptographic proof.
Post-quantum verification for every stage of the policy lifecycle
Underwriting
Replace questionnaires with attested control-state evidence
Claims
Verified system state at time of event — not what was reported after
Broker
Turn constrained accounts into placeable business in under 2 minutes
Four steps. Two minutes. Cryptographic proof.
Broker sends Terminal link
A unique, scoped link is generated for the policyholder.
Policyholder connects systems
OAuth-based, read-only connections. Takes approximately 2 minutes.
HATS produces attested state
Continuous, cryptographically signed control-state evidence.
Insurer receives verifiable inputs
For underwriting and claims — backed by post-quantum proof.
Clear boundaries. Clear outputs.
What HATS produces
- Attested control-state signals across 6 security domains
- Cryptographic proof bundles (ML-DSA-65, FALCON-512, SLH-DSA)
- Time-of-event assertions with deterministic state reconstruction
- Continuous monitoring with fresh attestation at every cycle
- Hash-only evidence — no raw data, no payloads
What HATS does NOT do
- Does not underwrite policies or assess risk levels
- Does not price premiums or determine coverage
- Does not bind coverage or issue policies
- Does not adjudicate, approve, or deny claims
- Does not make any decisions requiring an insurance license
See it in action
Explore how HATS works for underwriters, brokers, and policyholders — or review the trustless verification standard.
HATS produces verifiable control-state evidence. Insurers use it — H33 does not make underwriting or coverage decisions.