AIR
Proof Lab
StartEcosystem
Explore (579)Live Systems (52)Pricing
Log InGet API Key✓ Verify It Yourself
Financial services

Quantum-Safe Encryption for Banking

Related · tier-1 reading. For how to migrate before the NIST deadline and stay verifiable, see Post-Quantum.

The OCC and Federal Reserve expect quantum-readiness plans. SWIFT is building a PQ roadmap. Adversaries are harvesting encrypted traffic now. H33 gives banks post-quantum cryptography that is production-grade today.

1.67M
Auth/sec Sustained
74 B
Per Attestation
3
PQ Sig Families
0
Plaintext Exposure
H33 Products · Banking
What Quantum-Safe Banking is

Definition. Quantum-Safe Banking is an industry-vertical product that gives a bank a post-quantum path for its financial workflows — encrypted loan decisioning, KYC/AML verification, transaction attestation, and settlement verification — so records encrypted today stay confidential and independently verifiable across the quantum transition. It owns the banking migration workflow, the durable-confidentiality outcome, and the operational experience. It does not own, redefine, or reimplement the cryptography, proof, evidence, or governance it relies on; it composes them.

Why this exists. Data a bank encrypts today under RSA or ECDSA must remain secure for 7–30 years of regulatory retention — a window that overlaps credible quantum timelines and the harvest-now-decrypt-later threat. Post-quantum cryptography and FHE support the OCC, Federal Reserve, and NIST migration expectations; they do not by themselves make an institution compliant. Compliance is a separate determination made by your examiners and counsel against your full control environment.

The product boundary. Quantum-Safe Banking owns the banking migration workflow and outcome. It uses H33 mechanisms for privacy, proof, evidence, and governance; it does not redefine or own those mechanisms.

USES FHE

Encrypted computation

Fully homomorphic encryption lets scoring and settlement run on encrypted financial data so no plaintext PII is exposed. The product consumes FHE; it does not define or implement it.

USES ZK

Prove without revealing

Zero-knowledge proofs confirm identity and sanctions facts without transmitting the customer's PII. The product requests these proofs; the proving is owned elsewhere.

USES H33-74

Portable attestation

H33-74 supplies the 74-byte post-quantum attestation for each computation. The product attaches attestations; it does not produce the attestation primitive.

USES Verification

Independent verification

Verification lets auditors, regulators, and counterparties confirm a result offline. The product surfaces the verification surface; the verifying is owned elsewhere.

GOVERNED_BY Agent-008

Decision integrity

Agent-008 governs automated loan and settlement decisioning — preserving authority and preventing drift. The product is governed by it; it does not perform governance.

Replaceability

Still the same product

If Quantum-Safe Banking swapped BFV/FHE for another confidential-computing technology, or one signature family for another, it would still be Quantum-Safe Banking. The migration workflow and outcome are the product. Mechanisms are chosen, not owned.

The threat

The Quantum Clock Is Ticking for Banks

Quantum computers capable of breaking RSA-2048 and ECDSA are projected within the next decade. But the threat is not future — it is happening now.

Harvest-now, decrypt-later: Nation-state adversaries are intercepting and storing encrypted financial traffic today. When cryptographically relevant quantum computers arrive, they will retroactively decrypt years of stored transactions, authentication tokens, and signing keys.

For a bank, the data encrypted today under RSA or ECDSA must remain secure for 7-30 years (regulatory retention requirements). That window overlaps with credible quantum timeline estimates.

Regulatory pressure

Regulators Are Moving

Post-quantum migration is not optional for regulated financial institutions.

NIST PQC Standards (August 2024)
ML-KEM, ML-DSA, and SLH-DSA finalized as FIPS standards. Federal agencies required to transition.
OCC Guidance
National banks must inventory quantum-vulnerable cryptographic assets and develop migration plans.
Federal Reserve Expectations
Supervisory expectations for quantum risk assessments in IT examination process.
SWIFT PQ Roadmap
SWIFT is developing post-quantum requirements for cross-border financial messaging.
NSA CNSA 2.0
National Security Systems must transition to PQC by 2033. Financial systems handling government payments follow.
Solution
H33 for Banking
Encrypted computation on financial data, PQ-attested transactions, and independently verifiable audit trails — in a single API integration.
FHE

Encrypted Loan Decisioning

Run credit scoring models on encrypted applicant data via FHE. The scoring server never sees PII, income, or credit history. The decision is attested under H33-74 with three PQ signature families — producing an independently verifiable record that the decision was computed correctly. (Whether such a record is admitted as evidence in a given proceeding is a separate legal determination.)

ZK

KYC/AML Without Data Exposure

Verify identity and sanctions screening with zero-knowledge proofs. The proof confirms "identity verified, no sanctions matches" without transmitting the customer's PII to downstream parties. Reduces data breach surface by orders of magnitude.

H33-74

Transaction Attestation

Every financial computation produces a 74-byte PQ-signed attestation. The attestation is Bitcoin-anchorable — creating an independent, immutable timestamp that no party (including H33) can alter. Satisfies retention and audit trail requirements.

FHE + ZK

Settlement Verification

Compute settlement amounts on encrypted position data. Verify correctness with ZK proofs. Both counterparties confirm the settlement is correct without revealing their positions to each other. Every step is PQ-attested.

Attestation
Every Financial Computation in 74 Bytes

H33-74: The Audit Trail for Encrypted Finance

Every computation — loan decision, KYC verification, settlement calculation — produces a fixed 74-byte H33-74 attestation. This attestation is signed under three independent PQ signature families (ML-DSA-65, FALCON-512, SLH-DSA) and can be anchored to Bitcoin mainnet.

The result: a quantum-resistant, independently verifiable record of every financial computation your institution performs. The attestation is verifiable by any party — auditors, regulators, counterparties — without access to the underlying data. Admissibility in a specific legal proceeding remains a separate determination for counsel.

Learn more: How to Sign Encrypted Computation Without Decrypting It

Compliance
Compliance Certifications
H33 is pursuing the compliance certifications that financial institutions require.
JUNE 3, 2026

SOC 2 Type II

Service organization controls for security, availability, and confidentiality

JUNE 18, 2026

ISO 27001

International information security management system certification

AVAILABLE

HIPAA BAA

Business associate agreement for protected health information

Performance
Built for High-Throughput Financial Systems
2,293,766
authentications per second (sustained, full pipeline)
On Graviton4 metal-48xl (192 vCPUs). Full FHE + batch attestation + ZKP verification pipeline. 42 μs per authentication. Per-auth cost: ~$3.8 × 10-10. This is not a microbenchmark — it is the production pipeline running all three cryptographic layers.
Explore
Related Pages
When to use
When Quantum-Safe Banking is the right product — and when it isn't
Use it for a bank-wide post-quantum migration across financial workflows — loan decisioning, KYC/AML, transaction attestation, settlement — where records must stay confidential and verifiable for decades. Status is honest: the FHE, ZK, and H33-74 pipelines are production-grade today; SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 are in progress (target dates on /compliance/). Throughput figures are illustrative program benchmarks, not per-deployment guarantees — verify on /benchmarks/.
When NOT to use it — use a neighbor

Route to the right product

For receipt-bound authorization on the FedNow instant-payment rail specifically, don't use this — use FedNow instead. For cross-institutional fraud-ring and synthetic-identity detection across competing banks, use FraudShield instead. For wire-transfer proof specifically, use WireProof instead.

If you want the mechanism, not the product

Go to the mechanism hub

To evaluate a primitive directly rather than the banking workflow, read the FHE, ZK, H33-74, or Verification hubs. For the migration strategy itself, see Post-Quantum.

FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Quantum-Safe Banking?

An industry-vertical product that gives a bank a post-quantum path for its financial workflows — encrypted loan decisioning, KYC/AML verification, transaction attestation, and settlement verification — so records encrypted today stay confidential and verifiable across the quantum transition. It owns the banking migration workflow and outcome; it uses H33 mechanisms for privacy, proof, evidence, and governance rather than reimplementing them.

Which H33 mechanisms does Quantum-Safe Banking use?

It USES FHE so scoring and settlement run on encrypted data, USES ZK so identity and sanctions checks prove a fact without transmitting PII, USES H33-74 to attach a 74-byte post-quantum attestation to each computation, and USES Verification so any party can confirm a result offline. Automated decisioning is GOVERNED_BY Agent-008. The product composes these mechanisms; it does not own or redefine them.

Does using post-quantum cryptography make my bank compliant?

No. Post-quantum cryptography and FHE support compliance — they help satisfy encryption, audit, and migration expectations from the OCC, Federal Reserve, and NIST — but they do not by themselves make an institution compliant. Compliance is a separate determination made by your examiners and counsel against your full control environment. Quantum-Safe Banking provides verifiable cryptographic evidence toward that determination; it does not issue it.

Would it still be the same product if one mechanism were swapped?

Yes. If Quantum-Safe Banking swapped BFV/FHE for another confidential-computing technology, or one signature family for another, it would still be Quantum-Safe Banking. The banking migration workflow and the durable-confidentiality outcome are what it owns. Mechanisms are chosen, not owned.

When should I use Quantum-Safe Banking versus another product?

Use it for a bank-wide post-quantum migration across financial workflows. For receipt-bound authorization on the FedNow instant-payment rail specifically, use FedNow. For cross-institutional fraud-ring detection across competing banks, use FraudShield. To evaluate a mechanism directly, read the FHE, ZK, H33-74, or Verification hubs.

Quantum-Ready Banking Starts Today

The migration deadline is not theoretical. Start with an API key or talk to our team about enterprise deployment for your institution.

Questions? support@h33.ai