Cyber Insurance Demos
You are looking directly into your policyholder's systems right now. No audit. No questionnaire. No trust required.
When a control fails, you know in seconds — not at renewal. Your risk is math, not hope.
Each demo simulates a different cyber insurance scenario with real-time HATS conformance proofs, warranty enforcement, and subrogation evidence generation. Pick the one that matches your book.
LIVE
Continuous Warranty Monitoring
Live proof that warranted controls (MFA, EDR, backups, FHE) remain in force. Coverage auto-suspends on lapse. RFC 3161 timestamped subrogation evidence delivered to carrier, policyholder, and reinsurer.
- 6 warranty conditions monitored in real time
- Parametric trigger: score < 70 = $250K, < 50 = $2M
- Downloadable forensic subrogation packet
- HNDL / Post-Quantum readiness score (Tier 2)
- Portfolio aggregation — 247 insureds, concentration risk
Launch Demo →
COMING SOON
Q3 2026
Ransomware Response & Recovery
Simulates a ransomware event hitting a policyholder's AI pipeline. HATS detects the encrypted backup warranty lapse, triggers parametric payout, and generates court-ready evidence of the exact moment controls failed.
- Ransomware kill-chain detection via warranty lapse
- Backup encryption verification failure → instant alert
- Parametric payout triggered at score threshold
- Timestamped evidence chain for subrogation
- Recovery timeline with warranty restoration tracking
Coming Q3 2026
COMING SOON
Q3 2026
Third-Party Vendor Risk
Monitor a policyholder's vendor ecosystem. When a critical vendor's HATS score drops, the carrier sees concentration risk shift in real time. Systemic event detection for the CrowdStrike-class scenarios carriers fear most.
- Multi-vendor HATS score aggregation
- Concentration risk alerts (single-vendor dependency)
- Systemic event simulation (multiple insureds affected)
- Vendor warranty inheritance tracking
- Portfolio-level exposure heat map
Coming Q3 2026
COMING SOON
Q4 2026
D&O / AI Governance Liability
Directors & Officers liability for AI governance failures. HATS proves the board had continuous visibility into AI system compliance. Evidence that governance controls were in force at the time of the decision.
- AI governance policy binding proof (REQ-1.1)
- Board-level compliance dashboard evidence
- Decision record provenance for regulatory defense
- EU AI Act Technical Evidence Support Matrix
- 7-year evidence retention for litigation hold
Coming Q4 2026