Related · tier-1 reading. For the evidence chain that supports the claim, see Claims Evidence.
Not a dashboard. A proof feed. Making existing systems mathematically accurate.
INTERACTIVE DEMO
Illustrative — sample data, not a live feed
Below: five integration modes that, in production, receive HATS conformance proofs from a monitored enterprise data environment. The feed, scores, and signatures shown here are simulated for the walkthrough. In this illustrative scenario a reinsurer — shown as Munich Reinsurance Company for illustration only — receives mathematical proof that a policyholder's AI systems are operating within certified parameters, without seeing the underlying data. Trigger a violation to watch the claims workflow fire. This reinforces HATS, which records and monitors that protection stays true over time.
Policyholder probe active — 44 rules monitored across 3 data environments — FHE + ML-DSA-65 + FALCON-512 + SLH-DSA attestation pipeline
Mode 1 — REST API (Salesforce Record)REST
Policy IDPOL-MR-2026-001
SystemMR-AI-Underwriting-v3
HolderMunich Reinsurance Company
HATS TierTier 2 (FHE)
HATS Score95
Certificate StatusActive
Certificate IDHATS-MR-4A13F421
Open Violations0
Last Proof—
SignaturesML-DSA-65 · FALCON-512 · SLH-DSA
Mode 2 — WebSocket Proof StreamWS
Mode 3 — Webhook (Claims Workflow)HOOK
Standing by. Webhooks fire on violation — press Trigger Violation to activate claims workflow.
Mode 4 — SIEM Feed (Splunk / Datadog)SIEM
REQ-10.6 — Certificate VerificationPUBLIC API
Any counterparty can verify this certification status via public API — without contacting H33 or Munich Re.
Mode 5 — Embeddable WidgetEMBED
H33 HATS
95
Certification Score
MR-AI-Underwriting-v3 · Tier 2
HATS-MR-4A13F421
Drop into any existing UI. One line of code. Score updates as proofs arrive.