BenchmarksStack Ranking
APIsPricingDocsWhite PaperTokenBlogAboutSecurity Demo
Log InGet API Key
Updated March 30, 2026

H33 vs Zama — The Complete Comparison

50+ dimensions. Every product. Every benchmark. Every price point. One chart.

Get Free API Key See Benchmarks
By Eric Beans, CEO, H33.ai, Inc.
Dimension Zama H33
Company
Founded 2020, Paris 2025, Tampa
Funding $150M+, $1B valuation Self-funded
Team ~200, ~50% PhDs Lean
Focus Blockchain FHE Post-quantum security infrastructure
Open Source License BSD-3-Clear + patent license Apache 2.0 (no patent fee)
FHE Engines
FHE Schemes 1 scheme (TFHE only) 4 schemes: BFV-128 (exact integer), BFV-256 (NIST L5), CKKS (float/ML), BFV-32 (ultra-batch)
Auto Engine Selection No — one engine, one option FHE-IQ auto-routes to optimal engine in <500 nanoseconds
Hybrid Circuit Splitting Not possible (single engine) Auto-splits float + integer ops across CKKS + BFV
SIMD Batching Limited (no batch auth) 4,096 slots — 32 users per ciphertext, constant-time
Per-Operation Latency 124,000µs (124ms for a 64-bit add) 35.25µs per auth — 3,222x faster
Throughput 189K bootstraps/sec (requires 8x NVIDIA H100 GPUs) 2,209,429 auth/sec on CPU — 11.5x higher on 7,500x less expensive hardware
GPU Required Yes — H100 ($30K+/yr) for competitive performance No GPU. Graviton4 ARM CPU only.
Hardware Cost ~$15,000/mo per coprocessor operator ~$2/hr spot ($1,460/mo) — 10x less expensive
Batch Variance Not published ±0.71% over 120 seconds sustained (production measured)
Python FHE Compiler
Compiler Concrete (@fhe.compiler) H33-Compile (@h33.compile)
Backend Targets 1 (TFHE) 4 (BFV-128, BFV-256, CKKS, BFV-32)
Auto-Routing No Yes (FHE-IQ)
Hybrid Circuits No Yes (auto-split across engines)
Type System Runtime tracing Compile-time type annotations
License BSD-3 + patent license required Apache 2.0
Built In C++/MLIR/Python Rust + PyO3
Zero-Knowledge Proofs
ZK Type ZKPoK (encryption correctness only) Lookup STARK + AIR STARK + STARK-IQ auto-router
Proves Computation No Yes (AIR STARK)
Proves Policy Compliance No Yes
Proof Generation 6.9 seconds 0.059µs cached (117,000,000x faster)
Post-Quantum Secure No (acknowledged) Yes (SHA3-256 hash-based)
Trusted Setup No No
Auto-Routing (Lookup vs AIR) N/A Yes (STARK-IQ)
Post-Quantum Signatures
Dilithium (ML-DSA) None ML-DSA-65/87 (FIPS 204)
Kyber (ML-KEM) None ML-KEM-768/1024 (FIPS 203)
FALCON None FALCON-512
SPHINCS+ None Yes
Nested Hybrid (3-Key) None Ed25519 + Dilithium + FALCON
Attestation Latency N/A 189µs per batch
End-to-End PQ FHE only (lattice) FHE + ZK + Signatures + KEM
Biometrics
Production Biometrics No (research demo only) Yes (production, batched)
Users per Ciphertext 1 (demo) 32 (SIMD batched)
Verification Latency Not benchmarked 967µs for 32 users
Server Sees Biometric Yes (demo uses FastAPI) Never
Template Storage Not optimized 256KB/user (128x reduction)
Blockchain & DeFi
Primary Chain Ethereum (fhEVM) Solana
Smart Contracts fhEVM library 10 production contracts
TPS ~20 (CPU) Solana-native
Biometric Wallet No Yes (FHE-encrypted SCIF wallet)
Soulbound Identity No Yes (NFT + biometric binding)
PQ Transaction Signing No (relies on ECDSA/Ed25519) Yes (Dilithium attestation layer)
Token Economics $ZAMA (5% inflation) H33 token (deflationary burn)
ML on Encrypted Data
ML Framework Concrete ML (sklearn, PyTorch, XGBoost) CKKS + FHE-IQ + AI-Blind + H33-Compile
Encrypted LLM Fine-Tuning Yes (LoRA-based) Via CKKS approximate arithmetic
Auto Engine Selection for ML No Yes (FHE-IQ routes to CKKS for float)
AI Security Agents None 3 native agents (0.52–1.14µs)
Side-Channel Protection “Not yet implemented” AI agent (1.14µs)
Security & Compliance
SOC 2 None In progress (100% via Drata)
HIPAA None Compliant
ISO 27001 None Audit ordered
HATS Certification N/A Author & issuing authority
HICS Code Standard N/A Open source (Apache 2.0)
GDPR No compliance program Compliant by construction (FHE, zero data exposure)
CCPA / CPRA None Compliant (PII never in plaintext)
NIST AI RMF None HATS maps to NIST AI RMF 1.0
EU AI Act None HATS maps to EU AI Act (2024/1689)
NIST FIPS 203/204 No PQ signatures ML-KEM (FIPS 203) + ML-DSA (FIPS 204)
PCI DSS None FHE protects cardholder data in-use
SOX Section 404 None HATS audit trail supports SOX evidence
CNSA 2.0 Partial (FHE lattice only) Full PQ stack (BFV-256 at NIST L5)
Patent Claims All technology patented (license required) 144 patent claims pending
Security Audit Trail of Bits (blockchain only) Full production audit
Side-Channel Mitigation “Not yet implemented” AI-based detection (1.14µs)
Products
Total Products 5 39
Product Categories 3 (FHE, compiler, blockchain) 14
Product List TFHE-rs, Concrete, Concrete ML, fhEVM, Zama Hub FHE (4 engines) · ZK (4 products) · PQC (5 sig schemes) · Biometrics (3) · Blockchain (4) · AI/ML (4) · Compliance (3) · Platform (6) · DevTools (3) · Compiler (1) · MPC (1) · Video (1) · Search (1) · Storage (1)
Pricing
Free Tier Research use only 1,000 credits + BotShield 2,500/mo
Commercial License Patent negotiation required Self-service API key
Per-Operation Cost $0.005–$1.00 (blockchain) $0.001 per auth (at scale)
Infrastructure Self-hosted (~$15K/mo) Managed API (no infra)
GPU Costs ~$30K+/year per H100 node $0 (CPU only)
Patent Fee Required for any commercial deployment None (Apache 2.0)
Developer Experience
API Style Library (self-host) REST API + SDKs + RPC (via Helius)
Languages Rust, Python, C Any (REST, SDK, RPC)
SDKs Library only (no managed SDK) Native SDKs + Solana RPC via Helius
Setup Time Days (compile, configure, self-host) Minutes (API key)
FHE Parameter Expertise Required Not required (FHE-IQ handles it)
Documentation GitHub READMEs Full docs site at h33.ai/docs
Last updated: March 30, 2026

See the Difference in Production

One API call. Four FHE engines. ZK proofs and post-quantum signatures included.
Get API Key Read Documentation
1,000 free operations per month. No credit card required.