BenchmarksStack Ranking
APIsPricingStandardDocsWhite PaperTokenBlogAboutSecurity Demo
Log InTalk to UsGet API Key
Live Demo — Watch FHE Happen

Your AI doesn't need to see it to process it.

Paste any document with sensitive data. Watch H33 encrypt it, process it blind, and prove it mathematically. This isn't a video. This is live cryptography.

Try Blind Mode

Watch the FHE pipeline in real time

Choose a sample document or paste your own. Then hit Run and watch each stage of the cryptographic pipeline execute live.

Step 1 Your Data (Plaintext) Ready
Step 2 FHE Encrypted (What the AI Sees) Waiting
🔒
Ciphertext will appear here after encryption
Step 3 AI Processing (Blind Computation) Waiting
Encrypted field extraction...
Encrypted comparison (HbA1c threshold)...
Encrypted classification (risk model)...
Encrypted risk scoring...
Encrypted recommendation generation...
Step 4 Decrypted Result + Proof Waiting
🔍
Decrypted result and cryptographic proof will appear here
The Difference

A log entry vs. a mathematical proof

Every other compliance tool writes a log. H33 generates a cryptographic proof. One can be edited. The other cannot.

Every Other AI Compliance Tool
2026-03-17T08:45:12Z | model: gpt-4 | policy: hipaa-v2 | result: compliant | status: OK 2026-03-17T08:45:13Z | model: gpt-4 | policy: hipaa-v2 | result: compliant | status: OK 2026-03-17T08:45:14Z | model: gpt-4 | policy: hipaa-v2 | result: compliant | status: OK

A log entry. Written by the same system it's supposed to audit. Editable. Deletable. Not independently verifiable. This is what "trust our logs" looks like.

H33
FHE Attestation 0x7a3f...c91e ML-DSA-65 VALID ZK-STARK Proof 0x9b2d...4f8a VERIFIED Merkle Root 0xe4a1...7d03 On-Chain Anchor Solana Tx 5Kp9...mR7w CONFIRMED

Cryptographic proof. Independently verifiable. Post-quantum signed. Immutable. Auditor-verifiable without system access. This is what "cryptographically blind" looks like.

Industry Applications

Blind Mode works everywhere sensitive data meets AI

Every vertical has different data, different regulations, and different risk. The cryptographic guarantee is the same.

Input (PHI)
Patient: Sarah Chen, DOB: 03/15/1987
SSN: 482-55-7891
Diagnosis: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (E11.9)
HbA1c: 8.2% (High)
Medications: Metformin 1000mg BID, Lisinopril 10mg QD
Insurance: BlueCross ID BC-4488271
Provider: Dr. James Wright, Internal Medicine
Last Visit: 2026-02-28
Notes: Patient reports improved adherence.
Consider adding GLP-1 agonist.
AI Output (Decrypted)
Risk Assessment: MODERATE
Recommendation: Consider GLP-1 agonist therapy
Confidence: 0.87
Flags: HbA1c above target (>7.0%)
Care Gap: No retinal exam in 14 months
Next Action: Schedule endocrinology consult
HIPAA PHI Policy v3.2 — All 18 PHI identifiers (name, DOB, SSN, insurance ID) encrypted under BFV before model inference. Zero plaintext exposure. Proof bundle includes Dilithium attestation + STARK verification.
Input (Portfolio Statement)
Client: Robert J. Nakamura
Account: ****-7823 (Discretionary)
Portfolio Value: $4,287,401.22
As of: 2026-03-15

Holdings:
  AAPL   2,400 shares   $456,000.00
  MSFT   1,800 shares   $774,000.00
  BRK.B    500 shares   $237,500.00
  VXUS   8,200 shares   $524,800.00
  AGG    4,100 shares   $409,590.00
  Cash                  $885,511.22

YTD Return: +7.3% (Benchmark: +6.1%)
Risk Score: Moderate-Aggressive
Tax Lots: 23 positions with unrealized gains
Pending: $50K distribution req. (03/20/2026)
AI Output (Decrypted)
Compliance Status: SOX 404 COMPLIANT
Portfolio Risk: WITHIN MANDATE
Concentration Alert: Tech sector 28.7%
  (Threshold: 30% - approaching limit)
Tax Optimization: 3 loss-harvesting candidates
Distribution: Sufficient cash reserves
Suitability: ALIGNED with risk profile
Reg BI Check: PASSED
Recommendation: Rebalance tech exposure
SOX 404 / Reg BI Policy v4.0 — Client identity, account numbers, holdings, and portfolio value encrypted under BFV. Compliance analysis computed on ciphertext. Suitability determination cryptographically attested.
Input (Employee Performance Review)
Employee: David Park (ID: EMP-00847)
Department: Engineering
Manager: Lisa Fernandez
Review Period: Q4 2025

Performance Rating: 3.8 / 5.0
Salary: $187,500 (Band L5)
Equity: 2,400 RSUs (vesting 2027-03)
PIP History: None
Accommodation: Flexible schedule (ADA)

Manager Notes: David has exceeded sprint
velocity targets by 22%. Strong technical
leadership on the migration project.
Promotion candidate for L6 in H1 2026.
Needs improvement in cross-team communication.

Peer Feedback: "Best debugger on the team"
360 Score: 4.1 / 5.0
AI Output (Decrypted)
Bias Audit: PASSED (no demographic signals)
Pay Equity Check: WITHIN BAND (P62)
Flight Risk Score: LOW (0.18)
Promotion Readiness: HIGH (0.84)
ADA Compliance: ACCOMMODATION DOCUMENTED
Development Areas: Cross-team communication
Recommended Action: Add to L6 pipeline
Compensation Flag: NONE
Retention Priority: HIGH
CCPA / ADA / Pay Equity Policy v3.0 — Employee identity, salary, accommodation status, and review content encrypted under BFV. Bias audit performed on ciphertext. No demographic data accessible during AI analysis.

Ready to make your AI blind to sensitive data?

Your competitors will spend the next decade trying to explain why their logs should be trusted. You'll hand auditors a mathematical proof.

Get API Key Talk to Sales