Related · tier-1 reading. For the evidence chain that supports the claim, see Claims Evidence.
Data breaches. Ransomware. Insider threats. Business email compromise. They all require one thing: readable data. H33 makes data unreadable — permanently — even during processing. Certification under HATS provides your underwriting team with independently verifiable evidence of continuous conformance.
Category percentages and the "eliminated / neutralized" labels are illustrative and directional, not a guarantee. Encrypting data with FHE is designed to reduce the loss categories that depend on stolen readable data; it does not by itself settle a claim or make an insurer compliant.
Enter your book metrics. See the projected claim reduction if every policyholder ran H33.
Illustrative model. The 90% reduction factor is a directional assumption for exploring portfolio economics, not a guaranteed outcome. Actual claim reduction depends on coverage mix, adoption, and incident types.
HATS monitors every policyholder's encryption status continuously. Not annually. Not quarterly. Every minute. Cryptographically verified.
H33 Products · Cyber Insurance Claims
Definition. Cyber Insurance Claims is a product that attacks the business problem of cyber-insurance claims friction and disputes at its root: most claims exist because regulated data existed in readable plaintext, and adjudicating them is slow and adversarial. The product's workflow keeps policyholder data encrypted end to end and gives underwriters continuously verifiable evidence of which controls were active, so most disputes never arise. It owns the claims-reduction workflow, the carrier business outcome, and the policyholder experience. It does not own, redefine, or reimplement the encryption, monitoring, evidence, or verification it relies on; it composes them.
Why this exists. Carriers cannot price or defend risk they cannot see, and policyholders cannot prove controls they cannot cryptographically attest. This product exists to collapse that information asymmetry for the specific job of reducing cyber-claims friction — while leaving the underwriting and settlement decision with the insurer.
The product boundary. Cyber Insurance Claims owns the cyber-insurance-claims workflow and outcome. It uses H33 mechanisms for evidence, monitoring, and verification; it does not redefine or own those mechanisms. Cryptographic evidence supports underwriting and claims decisions; it does not by itself settle a claim or make an insurer compliant.
Fully homomorphic encryption keeps policyholder data unreadable even during processing, so a breach yields ciphertext instead of a claimable loss. The product consumes encrypted processing; it does not define it.
The continuous operational evidence cyber insurance relies on — every policyholder's encryption and control status, verified continuously — comes from HATS. The product is monitored by it and surfaces that evidence to underwriters; it does not perform the monitoring. HATS is the cyber-insurance mechanism; this product uses it.
H33-74 supplies the portable post-quantum attestation that carries claim and underwriting evidence across the carrier-reinsurer-regulator chain. The product commits and forwards the fact; it does not produce the attestation primitive.
Verification lets any party reach the independent verdict on a claim by reconstructing the evidence offline, with H33 not in the room. The product surfaces the verdict; the verifying is owned elsewhere.
Where autonomous agents act inside the workflow, Agent-008 governs them — preserving authority and preventing drift. The product is governed by it; it does not perform governance.
If the encryption scheme or the anchoring chain were swapped, this would still be Cyber Insurance Claims. The claims-reduction workflow and carrier outcome are what it owns. Mechanisms are chosen, not owned.
Use Cyber Insurance Claims when you are a carrier, MGA, or reinsurer trying to structurally reduce cyber-claims exposure and dispute cost across a book of policyholders — and you want that reduction backed by continuous, independently verifiable evidence rather than annual questionnaires.
To independently verify a specific filed claim from cryptographic evidence, use Cyber Claim Verification. For portable evidence bundles for underwriting and the carrier-reinsurer-regulator chain, use Claims Evidence. For the continuous cyber-insurance monitoring mechanism itself, see HATS.
To evaluate the underlying primitives, read FHE, H33-74, or Verification. This product is the insurance workflow and outcome; those are the building blocks.
Cyber Insurance Claims, and how the product composes H33 mechanisms.
It is a product that targets cyber-insurance claims friction and disputes. Most claims exist because regulated data was readable; the product keeps that data encrypted end to end and gives underwriters continuously verifiable evidence of active controls. It owns the claims-reduction workflow and outcome; it uses H33 mechanisms for encryption, monitoring, evidence, and verification rather than reimplementing them. Cryptographic evidence supports underwriting and claims decisions; it does not by itself settle a claim or make an insurer compliant.
It USES FHE so data stays encrypted even during processing, is MONITORED_BY HATS for the continuous operational evidence cyber insurance relies on, USES H33-74 for portable claim and underwriting evidence, and USES Verification for the independent verdict on a claim. Autonomous agents, where present, are GOVERNED_BY Agent-008. The product composes these; it does not own or redefine them.
No. Encrypting data is designed to reduce the categories of loss that produce most cyber claims, and the percentages on this page are illustrative for modeling, not a guarantee. Encryption removes a common attack payoff; it does not eliminate every claim, settle a claim, or by itself make an insurer or policyholder compliant. The insurer still makes the coverage and settlement decision.
Use this product for structural portfolio-level claims reduction. To verify a single filed claim, use Cyber Claim Verification. For portable underwriting evidence bundles, use Claims Evidence. For the monitoring mechanism itself, see HATS. To evaluate a mechanism directly, read the FHE, H33-74, or Verification hubs.
If 90% of claims never happen, everything about cyber insurance changes. We'd like to show you the math.
Talk to Our Insurance Team