PRODUCTION FHE • BENCHMARKED ON BARE METAL

Everyone Talks About FHE. We Ship It at Scale.

SEAL gives you a library. Zama gives you a toolkit. H33 gives you a production-grade FHE API that processes 32 users in 939 microseconds — with integrated ZK proofs and post-quantum Dilithium signatures — in a single REST call. No PhD required.

939µs
FHE Batch (32 Users)
2.17M/sec
Sustained Throughput
4
FHE Engines
$0.033
Per Operation

FHE Platforms — Side by Side

The difference between a library and an infrastructure: one requires a PhD to deploy. The other requires one API call. Ten critical dimensions, four platforms, one clear winner.

Feature H33 Zama (Concrete) Microsoft SEAL Duality
FHE Schemes BFV, CKKS, BFV-32, FHE-IQ TFHE only BFV, CKKS, BGV BFV, CKKS (OpenFHE fork)
Deployment Model Managed REST API Library (Rust / Python) Library (C++) Enterprise platform + consulting
ZK Proofs Integrated ZK-STARKs (0.059µs) No No No
PQ Signatures ML-DSA (Dilithium) + ML-KEM (Kyber) No No No
Biometric Matching 939µs / 32-user batch Build it yourself Build it yourself N/A
Published Throughput 2.17M ops/sec (Graviton4) Varies by workload 10–50ms typical Not published
Parameter Tuning Automatic (FHE-IQ engine) Manual — noise budgets, circuits Manual — noise, encoding, moduli Consulting-assisted
Open Source Partial (benchmarks, specs) Yes (BSD license) Yes (MIT license) No
Pricing $0.033/op (volume discounts) Free (you pay infra + engineers) Free (you pay infra + engineers) Enterprise licensing
Production Ready Yes — live API, bare metal Research / development Research / prototyping Enterprise pilots

Why H33 Wins

Open-source FHE libraries are brilliant research tools. They are not production infrastructure. Here is what ships with every H33 API call that the others simply do not have.

939µs for 32 Users. Not 32 Seconds.
Montgomery NTT with Harvey lazy reduction. NEON Galois acceleration. NTT-domain fused inner products. Batch CBD sampling. Production-tuned on bare metal Graviton4. Verified benchmarks →
🔒
ZK Proofs Built In. Not Bolted On.
Every FHE operation generates a ZK-STARK proof that the computation was correct — without revealing the data. 0.059µs per verification via in-process DashMap. No separate ZK stack to integrate.
🛡
Post-Quantum End to End
Lattice FHE + Dilithium signatures (291µs) + Kyber key exchange. The full pipeline is PQ-secure. SEAL and Zama give you the FHE lattice and leave the rest on classical crypto that quantum computers will break.
🎯
Four Engines. One API.
H33-128 (BFV N=4096) for speed. H33-256 (BFV N=8192) for max security. H33-CKKS for ML inference. H33-BFV32 (N=2048) for lightweight. FHE-IQ auto-selects the right engine per workload. Zero parameter tuning.
📦
API, Not Assembly Required
One REST call. No noise budget management, no encoding strategy decisions, no modulus chain configuration, no key rotation scheduling. The difference between shipping next week and shipping next year.
💰
$0.033/op vs. $300K/yr Engineers
SEAL and Zama are free to download. Productionizing them costs a team of cryptography PhDs, FHE-optimized infrastructure, and 6-12 months of engineering. H33 costs three cents and works today.

Benchmarked on Bare Metal. Not a Laptop.

v10 production benchmarks from AWS Graviton4 (c8g.metal-48xl, 192 vCPUs, 96 workers). Every number is reproducible. Full benchmark data →

939µs
FHE Batch
32 users / ciphertext
38.5µs
Per Authentication
end-to-end
0.059µs
ZK Verification
SHA3-256 / DashMap
291µs
Dilithium Attestation
ML-DSA sign + verify

One API Call. Not a PhD Thesis.

Encrypt data, compute on ciphertexts, and get a ZK-attested result — with post-quantum Dilithium signatures. While SEAL users are still configuring their noise budget, you are already in production.

FHE Encrypt + Verify (cURL) Shell
# Encrypt biometric data and verify against stored template
# FHE encryption happens server-side. ZK proof + Dilithium sig included.

curl -X POST https://api.h33.ai/v1/fhe/verify \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer h33_pk_..." \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "engine": "h33-128",
    "user_id": "user_abc123",
    "biometric": [0.23, -0.41, 0.87, ...],
    "options": {
      "zk_proof": true,
      "dilithium_attest": true
    }
  }'

# Response (939µs FHE + 0.059µs ZKP + 291µs Dilithium):
# {
#   "match": true,
#   "confidence": 0.97,
#   "zk_proof": "0x3a8f...",
#   "dilithium_sig": "ML-DSA-65:0xb4c1...",
#   "engine": "h33-128",
#   "latency_us": 1230
# }
JavaScript SDK JavaScript
const h33 = new H33Client({ apiKey: "h33_pk_..." });

// Encrypt + verify in one call. FHE-IQ auto-selects the engine.
const result = await h33.fhe.verify({
  userId:  "user_abc123",
  biometric: embedding,  // 128-dim vector, encrypted via BFV
  zkProof: true,
  attest:  true,        // Dilithium signature
});

// result.match       = true
// result.zkProof     = "0x3a8f..." (verifiable ZK-STARK)
// result.dilithiumSig = "ML-DSA-65:0xb4c1..." (PQ audit trail)
// result.latencyUs   = 1230

Each Platform in Detail

Fair assessment. Real strengths. Honest trade-offs. We respect the work that Zama, Microsoft, and Duality have done for FHE. We just built something different.

H33

H33 — Production FHE Infrastructure

The only FHE platform built for production API consumption at internet scale. Four FHE engines (H33-128, H33-256, H33-CKKS, H33-BFV32) with FHE-IQ auto-selection. Integrated ZK-STARK proofs and Dilithium/Kyber post-quantum signatures in a single REST call. 2.17M ops/sec on Graviton4 with 939µs biometric batches. Best for teams that refuse to spend a year building FHE infrastructure from scratch.

ZAMA

Zama — TFHE Compiler Toolkit

Open-source TFHE-rs (Rust) and Concrete-ML (Python) under BSD license. TFHE excels at boolean circuits, bit-level operations, and programmable bootstrapping. Concrete-ML makes encrypted ML inference approachable. Strongest choice for cryptography teams building novel FHE applications from scratch. Trade-off: single FHE scheme, no ZK proofs, no PQ signatures, no production deployment tooling, and you own all parameter tuning and infrastructure.

MICROSOFT SEAL

Microsoft SEAL — Academic FHE Library

Mature MIT-licensed C++ library supporting BFV, CKKS, and BGV. The most widely cited FHE library in academic research. Well-documented with strong community. Trade-off: 10-50ms typical latency for operations H33 does in microseconds, requires deep understanding of parameter selection, noise management, and encoding strategies. No API, no deployment model, no ZK proofs, no PQ signatures. Best for researchers and prototyping.

DUALITY

Duality — Enterprise FHE Consulting

Enterprise FHE platform built on an OpenFHE fork with professional services. Supports BFV and CKKS with a focus on regulated industries and data collaboration. Recently pivoted toward secure data sharing use cases. Trade-off: closed-source, enterprise-only pricing, no self-service API, consulting-heavy model means slower time-to-production. Best for large enterprises that need hands-on FHE guidance and have long procurement cycles.


Frequently Asked Questions

What is the best FHE platform for production use?

H33 is currently the only FHE platform designed for production API deployment at internet scale. It processes 2.17 million authentications per second on AWS Graviton4 with integrated ZK proofs and post-quantum Dilithium signatures. Zama and Microsoft SEAL are research-grade libraries that require significant cryptography expertise and infrastructure engineering to productionize. Duality offers enterprise consulting but does not provide a self-service API. If you need FHE in production this quarter, H33 is your only option that does not require hiring a cryptography team.

Which FHE scheme should I use — BFV, CKKS, or TFHE?

BFV is best for exact integer arithmetic and batched operations like biometric matching — H33 uses BFV to process 32 users in 939 microseconds. CKKS is best for approximate arithmetic and machine learning inference on encrypted data. TFHE excels at boolean circuits and bit-level operations. H33 offers all three paradigms via four engines (H33-128/BFV, H33-256/BFV, H33-CKKS, H33-BFV32) plus FHE-IQ auto-selection, so you never need to manually choose. Zama offers TFHE only. Microsoft SEAL offers BFV, CKKS, and BGV.

Do any FHE platforms include zero-knowledge proofs?

Only H33. Every H33 FHE operation generates a ZK-STARK proof that the computation was performed correctly on encrypted data, without revealing the data itself. Verification takes 0.059 microseconds via in-process DashMap lookup. Zama, Microsoft SEAL, and Duality focus exclusively on FHE computation and do not include ZK proof generation. If you need verifiable encrypted computation, you either use H33 or build your own ZK layer from scratch.

Which FHE platforms are post-quantum secure end to end?

All FHE schemes (BFV, CKKS, TFHE, BGV) are inherently post-quantum resistant because they are based on lattice problems. However, H33 is the only platform that also includes post-quantum digital signatures (ML-DSA/Dilithium at 291µs) and key exchange (ML-KEM/Kyber) for end-to-end post-quantum security across the entire pipeline. Other platforms rely on classical RSA or ECDSA for signing and key management, which quantum computers will break.

Is open-source FHE better than a managed API?

Open-source libraries (Zama under BSD, SEAL under MIT) give maximum flexibility and zero licensing cost. But the real cost is not the license — it is the team of cryptography engineers, the months of parameter tuning, the infrastructure, and the ongoing maintenance. H33 abstracts all of that into a single API call at $0.033 per operation. For teams with dedicated FHE researchers building novel cryptographic applications, open-source may be preferable. For everyone else shipping a product, H33 gets you to production in days instead of quarters.

How do FHE platform costs compare?

Zama and SEAL are free to download. Productionizing them typically costs $300K-500K/year in specialized engineer salaries plus infrastructure. Duality charges enterprise licensing with custom pricing. H33 charges $0.033 per operation with volume discounts down to $0.008/op — including all FHE computation, ZK proofs, Dilithium signatures, and infrastructure. At 1 million operations per month, H33 costs $33,000/year versus the $500K+ to build and maintain equivalent in-house infrastructure.
SHIP FHE TODAY

Stop Researching FHE. Start Shipping It.

Free tier includes 1,000 FHE operations per month. Four engines. ZK proofs. Dilithium signatures. One API call. No credit card required.

Get Free API Key → Read the Docs